Interview with Ricardo Pinto
by Victoria Strauss
Ricardo Pinto was born in Lisbon, Portugal. When he was six, his
family moved first to London and then Dundee, Scotland. He received a degree
in mathematics at Dundee University, and in 1983 moved to London without
a job and bluffed his way into writing computer games for a local firm. Some
time later, a friend whose company produced tabletop wargames asked Pinto
to design a world. This led to the self-publication of his first book, Kryomek.
Further work in gaming that allowed him to continue writing finally led to the sale of the three-volume epic
The Stone Dance of the Chameleon, the first volume of which, The Chosen, was published in 1999.
Ricardo Pinto's Website
Review of The Standing Dead
You've said that you don't read much fantasy. And certainly your books,
while epic in scope, don't reflect a lot of the concerns of “typical” epic
fantasy. What drew you to work in a fantastic mode?
My
books are only classified as fantasy because that's the shelf that my publishers
decided would be the most appropriate for them to be on in a bookshop. The
idea that “fantasy” should have typical concerns alarms me. All stories are
an act of imagination on which it seems to me counter-productive to impose
limits...
More precisely
then--what interests, thematic concerns and/or preferences made you want
to write in a setting you made up from scratch, as opposed to a “real world”
historical setting?
There
are so many reasons. On one level, I suppose it comes down to control. I
probably will write historical fiction, but such work would be, naturally,
constrained by what is known about the period. I wanted to work with perfect
freedom. Aspects of the Roman emperors fascinate me, for example, and these
(among others), seen through a “fairytale lens” have become my Masters. In
an invented world, one can apply the exaggerated blacks and whites of chiaroscuro
not only to the interpretation of a character, a people--but by means of
invention--one can dramatically sculpt their entire world. By this means,
greater clarity, greater power can be achieved. In short, every aspect of
the work can become finely tuned to one's themes...
Could you describe how you went about creating the world of The Stone Dance of the Chameleon,
and also how much of the world building pre-dated the writing of the book?
Initially
my work was very heavy on creative research. This was the only way I could
think of fighting off the fear of arbitrariness--which is one aspect of the
tyranny of the blank page which plagued me. In the process, I generated enough
material that writing became an act of exploration.
At first the Three Lands were merely a setting for me to illustrate. Then, when I gave up designing
computer games, I carried that discipline's world-building paradigm into
my writing. The world and the books evolved slowly together. As I have become
more experienced, I have become, thankfully, lighter on my feet...
You produced the first version of The Stone Dance in the early 1980's, and it went through several incarnations along the road to publication. Could you describe that journey?
One summer while I was doing my degree, I typed up a 600-page manuscript which contained a first, vague impression of The Stone Dance.
It was complete rubbish. Computer games kept me busy for 10 years. Then I
spent two years unemployed teaching myself to write--producing a first draft
of the second and half of the third volumes. Very little of this work survives
in the published books. By the time that reading what I had written no longer
sickened me, I was lucky to find an excellent, budding agent called Victoria
Hobbs. She liked what I had to show her and together we worked this up into
a 100 page submission which she was able to sell to Transworld on its first
outing. It still took me a couple of years from there to finish The Chosen...
Were you aware
at the time of how unusual it is for a new writer to sell a series on the
basis of a partial?
This
is the first time that I have even considered this. *grin* I seem to have
been very fortunate with my publishers--all of whom have been extremely patient
with me as I have drifted far over contractual deadlines. Clearly there is
pressure, but the worst is that which I inflict upon myself--though my primary
concerns are always with the contents and the quality of the books themselves...
What's the process
you go through to actually write a book--do you outline? Synopsize? Do character
sketches? How much revision do you do?
Each
of my three books has been written using a progressively revised technique.
Currently, I have spent more than a year working on an outline--I have not
written a single word of the final book. This outline consists of a central
document which I call “tapestry” into which I weave the “threads” for each
character and theme. As for revisions, if the previous two books are anything
to go by, I can do as many as six complete run throughs....This is not neurotic
perfectionism. My readers will, eventually, become aware of just how complex,
how finely crafted the books have had to be...
Looking back on the first book from the vantage point of the third, is there anything you'd change or do differently?
Please
don't start me on this....The answer is yes and a short reason for this would
be that the first book was driven by the setting; the third by its characters.
This indicates the transition that I have had to make from designing computer
games to writing novels...
You've created
a setting that's not only rich and fascinating, but genuinely alien--it’s
clear that you've drawn inspiration from numerous cultures but the total
picture is unlike anything in real-world history. Did you consciously set
out to accomplish this, or was it something that emerged as part of the creation
process?
We
have all lived through a period of transition from a Eurocentric, chauvinist
view of the world to a more equitable one. I am a product of my time, and
have found enduring fascination in other cultures and other times. Limiting
my vision to Medieval Europe was never a possibility for me.
Though, like everyone else, I borrow much from what is or has been, my borrowings have been ground
down in my mind into such small pieces that they are unrecognizable in the
mosaic of my books.
Especially in The Standing Dead,
the details of flora and fauna recall a prehistoric world; for me at least
this suggests that the action is taking place on this earth, in a distant
period of our own prehistory. Was this your intent, and if so, why?
*grin*
What you have noticed is a large survival from my 1980's idea. Then I had
the conceit that the Three Lands were Late Cretaceous Antarctica--that my
world could be there, hidden beneath the ice. Like many people, I have an
abiding fascination with dinosaurs. There are many other consequences that
flow from this original premise. For example, the 396 day year (396.145,
to be more precise) and a day of 23.63 hours--which came as a result of calculations
I made of the Earth's faster spin and wider orbit in the Cretaceous.
There's a lot
of wonder and strangeness in your books--but no magic. Did you deliberately exclude magic, or was it just
that your world didn't need it?
Though
fascinated by the idea of magic, my world excludes it because ours does--and
this is another consequence of having that early notion of setting it in
Earth's remote past...
Themes of domination
and oppression are prominent in the books--the brutal oppression of subject
peoples by an arrogant elite, but also the way that the oppressed will themselves
try to dominate, if they're given the chance. What real-life concerns of
yours does this reflect?
I
believe that, sadly, this reflects reality. To be contentious: have the people
that were the chief victims of the Holocaust not then gone on to become oppressors
in their own right? My concern is with exploitation. Particularly, the exploitation
that we in the West have visited upon the rest of the world--which continues
to this day. My Masters in their paradise within its Sacred Wall are not
that unlike the West that similarly profits from those outside its enclaves
of prosperity, while at the same time choosing not see the poverty they help
to support....
Is this an intentional parallel, then--do you mean to make a political statement in the books?
Initially, this parallel--along with many others that The Stone Dance
contains that relate to our common past, the present and a possible future--welled
up from my subconscious. Later these aspects became a core and conscious
part of what the books are about. So yes, The Stone Dance expresses my most deeply held political beliefs...
Two of the three
races in your books (the Chosen and the Maruli) incorporate extraordinary
cruelty into their cultures. What drew you to create such brutal societies?
Are
the cruelties in my books really so extraordinary? During the time I have
been writing Rwanda happened. Just because the cruelty in our world rarely
happens on our side of the TV screen does not mean that it is not real...
Yes, but such atrocities, while perhaps not extraordinary in terms of overall human history, are
extraordinary cultural events--obviously they rise from hatreds, prejudices
and tensions in the culture, but they’re unusual, rather than common, expressions
of them. What's interesting about your cultures is that the cruelty isn't
a sudden catastrophic outburst but a normal part of the social fabric.
I
believe, and I feel I could justify these beliefs, that our entire civilization
is built on extraordinary cruelty. That this cruelty is hidden from our eyes,
mirrors that way that my Masters cannot see the world outside their Sacred
Wall. Even when they move outside it--as Aurum, Jaspar and Vennel do in The Chosen--they
move like extremely rich tourists through a Third World country--in which
they believe that the poverty they see is just the way things have to be.
Admittedly, they do perpetrate acts of cruelty, but not more so than the
Nazis did, or Stalin....Like Hitler, they deny others compassion through
believing them to be sub-human. One of the core things that my book is about
is exploring societies of this type...
For the most
part, religion is a very dark thing in the books--especially the religion
of the Maruli, who worship what they fear and hate most. What drew you to
this?
I
believe that there are those who have made of religion a very dark force.
For many, religion brings certainty, and certainty breeds contempt for other
points of view. There is nothing happening in my books so brutal that I could
not find examples in our world that are worse...
I'm sure you're
sick of answering this kind of question...but building a book around gay
characters, while not as controversial as it used to be, is still a
somewhat risky choice. Do you feel this has made a difference in the books'
reception?
I
would have felt a coward, if at least in my first book I had not written
about my own life experience. I feared this choice might be disastrous commercially,
but it would have been dishonourable to do otherwise. There have been voices
raised in protest, but I have been delighted by how few of these there have
been, and never, as far as I am aware, among the publishing community....It
seems there is some hope in the world after all *grin*
You mention on
your website that you originally used Quya throughout the books, but later
decided to render characters' names and other terms in English as a way to
make things easier for readers. How do you go about maintaining the balance
between the need for narrative clarity and the need to convincingly present
your very complicated setting?
I
can make no excuse for lack of narrative clarity except for the inability
that came from inexperience. I chose to write about my complicated world
and so it is up to me to let my readers into it without forcing them to read
technical treatises. From my current vantage point, I realize that I could
have written The Chosen, in particular, more leanly--however, not as much so as some have said--as I hope will become apparent when The Stone Dance is complete...
You've said (elsewhere)
that your books are meant to be read twice--once for exploration and again
for understanding. Is this a literary stance (do you feel that all fantasy
should unfold itself to the reader this way), or is it a function of your
books in particular?
I will not lecture anyone else on how they should write their books. When it is finished, The Stone Dance
will have taken up ten years of my life. I have no doubt that it was an absurdly
ambitious undertaking, but having committed myself to it, I will pursue it
doggedly to the end. As a consequence of this ambition, however, its structure
is extremely complex, far more so than might appear on the surface. One of
the many aspects of The Stone Dance is that it will be a completely different experience if it is read a second time...
You have a terrific
website that offers fascinating information about the books' background and
setting. What do you want to accomplish with the site, and how will you
expand it in future?
My
website is intended to be an information resource to accompany the books.
It will not only serve to amplify the text but show some of my thinking and
decisions as I wrote them. It allows my readers to contact me as well as
influence how the site develops. There is currently lots of material on the
language Quya as well as the glyphs with which it is written. Soon there
will be spoken Quya as well as some music which a friend of mine has composed.
I hope perhaps one day, as the technology develops, to embed the books themselves,
thus allowing them to be dynamically hyperlinked to the support material....
Can you give some hints as to what the final installment of the trilogy will include?
I'm
afraid not. All I can say is that there will be many revelations and surprises...and,
if I can pull it off, a most satisfying closure where not a single thread
will be left loose...
Any thoughts on what you'll write next?
Ideas have been piling up over the years that I have been building The Stone Dance.
Currently I have plans for more than a dozen novels. As to which one of these
I write next, or perhaps something that I have not even imagined yet, I am
looking forward to having the freedom to decide....
|