| Barry
B. Longyear's |
||||||
| Writing Instruction Copyrighted Material |
||||||
| Science- Fiction Writer's Workshop-I 2002 |
The Write Stuff 2011 |
Imagine Or Die 20?? |
| The Write Stuff Sample |
||||
| "Writing the best
stories of which you are capable." |
||||
|
The Write Stuff
by Barry B. Longyear Contents and Sample Chapters:
Introduction,
8
PART III: What Is A Story? 154 PART IV: The Research, 263 PART
V: The Writing, 360 PART VI: The Rewriting, 432
We’re
going to look at wrong stuff first
for the same reason that instructional courses in fungus appreciation
begin by
identifying the varieties of mushrooms that will kill you. If you’re
dead,
there’s not much point in taking the rest of the course. If you are
nibbling
some of those career killers right now, this will be your opportunity
to stop.
Similarly, if your original choices in approaching a writing career
take all of
the creativity, fulfillment, meaning, potential, communication,
importance, and
fun out of it, you’d be better off taking a well paying job that you
really
hate. The bars, back alleys, and graveyards are filled with men and
women—published writers—who achieved the goal of publication, made
money at it,
cranked out yards of middling to good writing, and hated every minute
of it.
And that constituency is minuscule compared to the endless multitudes
who
wanted to write but were ground into nothingness by misdirection,
frustration,
paralysis, and self-sabotage. Sounds
like fun, doesn’t it? So, let’s get
started identifying the fungus that will kill your writing. I want to write like So-and-so This
is the trap that catches the greatest
majority of those suddenly inspired to write. Perhaps you’ve just
finished
reading J. R. R. Tolkien, Alex Haley, Guy Sajer, James Baldwin, Harry
Harrison,
Jr., or Agatha Christie and a tiny little spark ignites in the back of
your
brain. You don’t poke at it or examine it—it might extinguish. But it
seems to
be drawing you toward blank screens and keyboards, and many of you
interpret
this feeling as a “need to write.” Time after time we have uncovered
such in
workshops and writing seminars, and when they are forced to examine
their
motivations for writing, much of it boils down to “I really want to
write like
So-and-so.” It’s
actually a compliment to the author.
“I really liked that book. That author really spoke to me.” Why
is this a problem? Aside from the
troubling fact that So-and-so is already writing So-and-so’s stories,
even if
you did rip off some characters and ape a certain style, setting, and
structure, about the best you could do is to turn out mediocre
similarities.
So-and-so’s writing is appealing to you, probably, because that author
was
writing his or her own stories—not someone else’s. Even if you do avoid
the
legal and critical entanglements, writing to emulate another author
completely misses
the point of writing. You’ll be trying to write stories you’d like
reading. You
won’t be writing the stories you need to write: Your stories. At the end, even
if you do manage to drive yourself into publication and financial
success
writing someone else’s stories, which almost never happens, you’ll be a
failure
as a writer, and you’ll know it. Whatever You Want I
suppose the one thing sillier than
modeling your writing after a writer you like is modeling your writing
after
writers you don’t like. Who would do a moronic thing like that?
Hundreds of
thousands of aspiring writers, that’s who. “Guideline
Wisdom.” You’ve seen it in
writing books, heard it in creative writing courses, and pondered it
when it
appeared in magazine and publishing house submission guidelines: “Read
several
issues of our magazine (or check out our publishing line at the
bookstore), see
what we’re buying, go forth and do likewise.”
Deadly Input From
aping writers we like to aping
writers we don’t like much, the next step down to gut-wrenching
obscurity is to
mold our efforts after the opinions of persons who don’t write, edit,
publish,
or even read much, and putting all of our personal relationships at
risk at the
same time. Creativity.
Everyone has it to one degree
or another. If parents, peer pressure, and teachers haven’t crushed it
by the
time we get through the compulsory education system, we continue the
process
ourselves by following the poisonous recommendations mentioned above.
You don’t
need creativity to get published. There are those who actually do make
it into
print writing other persons’ stuff, doing just what writing teachers,
friends,
editors, and editorial guidelines tell them to do. A very few even make
a
pretty good living at it, if all you look at is money. The ending,
however, is
bitter. As one writer late in his career once put it, “I did exactly
what they
told me, and I never got to write my own stories. Now I don’t think I
can.” _______________________________________________ Assignment: Why Write? This truth may not set you
free, but it might save you from wasting what time and talent you have.
If you
find yourself putting down, “I need to write,” throw out your list and
start
over. Why do you “need to write”? What exactly will the writing get
you? What
change will it make in you? Write your list, rewrite your list, throw
it away
and do it over again and again until you know you have been honest with
yourself. In the next chapter, we’ll see if you managed to come up with
an
answer that won’t destroy you.
Why
do you want to be a writer? The most common answers to that question
are:
"I don't know; I just do," "I don't know, I just want to,"
and "I don't know; I just need to write." They're all half right:
they don't know. More accurately, they are not aware of their reasons.
One
person takes a need for approval and hides it behind "I don't know."
Yeah, that person knows, and so do you. In an intense workshop
environment it
takes some time but with some prodding it is often possible to poke
through the
smoke and find the actual reasons. In
"Why Write?" in the previous chapter, I asked you to write down what
it is you hope writing will do for you. If every fantasy about your
writing
were to come true, what would they be? And, of course, that's exactly
what you
did, right? Right. Someone
didn't do the assignment. Astounding. For
those of you who did the homework, skip to the next heading, "Becoming
Somebody or Nobody" below. For those who didn't do the homework,
continue
with "Self-help and self-delusion."
Self-help
and Self-delusion If
you simply read through the materials in this course, you will come out
the
other end feeling better about yourself, as well as more knowledgeable
about
fiction writing and career writing, as well as more hopeful about your
own
writing future. This feeling will last for perhaps a couple of hours,
or a
couple of days if you are really delusional. However, you won't be even
a
micron closer to achieving either the possibilities that are open to
you
through writing or achieving the goals you are so reluctant to commit
to paper. Feeling
good feels good, and I have no objection to it in moderation. But to
get in
touch with those pieces of yourself that make up you, much less
assemble and
tune them into becoming your personal writing dynamo, it is first
necessary to
get in touch with those pieces of yourself that make up you. It is not
a
comfortable process. It is, however, the foundation upon which the
remainder of
this edifice that is your publishing future is to be built. The
first pieces of you we're going to look for are your expectations, your
hopes,
your dreams about writing and what creating the best stories of which
you are
capable might do for you. Write them down. If you don't, you might ask
yourself
what the point is in working a course whose author/instructor you don't
respect
enough to perform the assignments. That's how all those lazy fungus
appreciation students keep winding up dead. Do the assignments. Write
down what
you hope writing will do for you. "Well,
my reasons might sound silly or selfish." It
doesn't matter. Write them down. You don't have to show them to anyone.
This
isn't something you're putting down for generations of future
literature
students to ponder. This is information for you. Writing
is, among other things, a lifelong process of self-discovery. If you
don't want
to know who you are, you've just thrown away your main writing and
story-telling machine as well as your fuel supply. You're embarrassed
to write
down your reasons, even for yourself? Cut
the lace off your panties and do the work! "Oh,
but I'm afraid it will look so self-serving or pumped up." No
kidding. Look, here are the reasons I had when I began writing many
years ago:
I wanted approval, fame, and success. Success for me meant money and
more
approval and more fame, for should I at long last become a success in
my own
eyes, all of my problems would be solved, this great wound I have in my
soul
would be healed, and I would live happily ever after. I wanted to get
laid,
too. Now, was that so hard? Write
down your expectations or you might as well stop reading here, because
going
farther would just be a waste of time and eyestrain.
Over
the years I have asked writers, pros and beginners alike, what their
personal
expectations of writing were when they first started out. Their answers
fall
into the same four general categories. The first, and easily the
largest,
category was the one I was in when I first started out. By becoming
writers, by
being regarded as writers, this will somehow make up for some
deficiency in their
lives. The discarded, the lost, the troubled, and the tortured flock to
writing
hoping that by filling blank sheets of paper with enough words someday
they
might hit the jackpot, achieve writing success, and that will take care
of
everything. To quote a few of those who have gone before you about
their secret
and not-so-secret fantasies about what a writing career might bring
them:
"Applause.
I want to hear some applause in my life." "I
want to become somebody." "Money,
babes, fast cars, and more money!" "Respect.
I would get the respect of the persons I admire." "I
want to see my name in print wherever I go." "My
family would be proud of me." "I'd
get to rub elbows with famous people." "I
want what I do to influence people." "I
want never to be forgotten." "I
want to become a part of something—to belong." "I
want to entertain people, make them laugh." "It
would be, when I speak, everybody listens." "I'd
finally be able to prove to everyone that I'm not a loser."
They
are all different ways of saying the same thing: becoming a writer will
make up
for what I am not to myself. The
second category is made up of those who would use writing and writing
success
as escapes; as though being a writer is some kind of drug through which
awareness of one's own demons can be dulled or, perhaps, even driven
away.
"It's
where I hide from the world." "The
monsters I deal with in stories are a lot less frightening than the
real ones
out there." "If
I can write well enough to keep my head filled with detail and pay for
locks on
the doors, it'll be all the success I'll ever need."
They
are all different ways of saying, if I hide beneath my blanket at
night, keep
my eyes shut real tight, and whistle my tune really loud, the monsters
can't
get me. Before we go into the third category, a word about monsters:
What To Do With Monsters Understand
that there are no good reasons or bad reasons to become a writer, and
there's
nothing wrong with having problems. As a matter of fact and long
experience,
every problem you've ever had, all the scars you've ever acquired, are
literary
treasures in your piggy bank to be drawn upon when needed for story
inspiration, writing, and characterization purposes. It's the
individual who
never experienced adversity who is in big trouble. What can a person
who has
never had any problems write about that would be of any use or interest
to me?
Computer manuals? Pillsbury Doughboy commercials? Getting
down on the mat and grappling hammer and tongs with outside obstacles
by
vanquishing your inner demons is the stuff of great fiction. And real
demons
and monsters are always the best because so many of us carry and have
to deal
with similar critters. Cherish your monsters, get to know them well,
and then
put them to work for you writing stories. Monsters,
however, make terrible career counselors. They are not in touch with
the real
world. My little demon told me that if I became a writing success, all
my
problems would be solved. My conception of success became focused
exclusively
on things outside of myself: sales, contracts, reviews, awards, and
even
Hollywood. And I actually achieved them all. There
is no devastation quite as profound as achieving all your goals and
finding out
you read the rule book incorrectly—that all those sales and awards
haven't changed
a single thing inside. And, as to using a writing career as an escape
from
mental monsters, there are real monsters stalking the halls of
publishing that
make even the gods tremble. Your
demons? There are only the facts of reality; Fire plus water equals
fizzle. If
you aren't already somebody to yourself, taking on writing isn't going
to
change that even if a Nobel Prize for literature drops in your lap.
Every round
of applause you get as a writer feels really good for awhile, and then
it wears
off and you discover to your dismay that nothing's changed and you are
still
you. As a special treat, when you at last realize that all you have
accomplished hasn't made you into a whole person, you discover that the
hole
you are standing in is deeper than when you started. For
the escape artists, as you're being eaten alive by the cannibals of
publishing
comes the realization that not only is being a writer no protection
from your
own demons, believing so left you wide open for monsters who have put
criminal
indifference on a short-term cash-and-carry basis. I'll never forget
when it
finally got through to me that in publishing we all really aren't in
this
together serving a sacred mission to place my exquisite little stories
before
an eager readership. Strange. As I wrote that, I blushed. It still
bothers me
to have had that particular scale scraped from my eyes.
The Strange Ones The
third category of reasons for writing are put forward by a highly
peculiar
minority who are apparently healthy and well-adjusted.
"I
am so full of love I simply want to share myself and my good fortune
with
others." "I
like to play with my imagination and I want playmates: readers." "I
love entertaining."
Of
course, my first reaction to seeing the like in a seminar is to judge
such
persons to be extreme escape artists so far down the hole of denial
that there
is no conceivable hope of turning them back. But it turns out there are
healthy, well-adjusted persons in the world and a number of them choose
to
write. The ones I think I've met professionally and in seminars are
interested
mostly in inspirational stuff, how-tos on everything from gardening to
getting
your head screwed on straight, rose-garden mysteries, some academic
tomes, and
children's stories. There is at least one science fiction writer I know
who
fits into this category. By and large this group looks
upon writing as a means to further ends that have nothing to do with
therapy. The physical and mental act of writing itself
is not important.
It's "okay," or "fun," or even "a bother," but
they can take it or leave it. Although I can't relate to this group
myself,
their approach appears to be grounded in reality and relatively risk
free.
These are the folks who, upon receiving a rejection in the mail, turn
around
and send the piece right out to another editor without smashing a
window, going
into a funk, getting into an argument, beating themselves up, or
anything. I
don't know how they do it. They may be from another planet.
Kunta Kinte, Where Are You? Fourth
and last, there is this group who have just enough of a grip on reality
to know
where writing successfully fits in. By itself writing is not going to
fix
anything in your physical, mental, or economic life. It can, however,
begin to
fill that bottomless pit in your soul sometimes referred to as a "need
for
creative fulfillment," or "expressing yourself." Actually, it's
neither. The things we write, the things we publish, are like marking
trees or
leaving sign in the forest. We are urging the other members of our
pack, our
tribe, our nation to track us down and find us. The first member of the
tribe
we want to track us down and find us is ourselves. Self-discovery. In
this last, select little group, the primary purpose of writing is not
to
communicate with "the reader," whoever he or she might be. The
primary purpose of writing, particularly fiction writing, is to
communicate
with yourself. If enough of the other members of your tribe pick up on
the
vibes and want to go along for the ride, that is the part of this
occupation
called an economically viable career. It is not, however, the
purpose—the
reason—for the writing. If
you focus on increasing the numbers of tribal members who are going
along for
the ride, instead of focusing on finding yourself, you wind up writing
for
other tribes and never do get around to writing your own stories and
finding
your own tribe (go ahead, call it a "readership" if it makes you feel
better). You
have to earn your way into this fourth group. Turn your emotional
issues over
to those who can do something about them (but take plenty of notes).
Shake out
your expectations and fantasies until all you have left for reasons to
write
are: writing your own stories and having endless outrageous
roller-coaster
rides doing so. If
approval, fame, applause, and riches follow, then that will be nice, but not
necessary. It's
choosing to make those things necessary that changes our
focus and sets us up for failure. "So,
instead of finding out what people want and then producing that, you're
telling
us to find our own unique stories, then run them up the flagpole and
see if
anybody salutes?" Not
exactly. Write your own stories. Running it up the flagpole is the job
of the
publisher's marketing department. And the reason for doing it? As one
writer
put it to me: "It's a ride, man. It is a ride."
Which Bus Did You Take? Is
this an exciting vision of a meaningful and rewarding future, or is
this a
prescription for flaming ruin and humiliating failure? I mean, it says
it right
there in the editorial guidelines: "Read several issues of our
publication
to see what we're buying, go forth and do likewise." Editors
wouldn't say that if they didn't mean it, would they? Would they?
Early
in my career, I cornered a science fiction book editor at a party and
put that
very question to him. He didn't say yes or no. Instead, he talked about
a story
by a new author that he had recently purchased that he thought was
terrific. It
wasn't in an area he particularly liked—an awful lot of
medieval sword swinging and such—"But," he said, "I had to buy
this one." Then he looked at me and said, "Barry, you know what I'm
really looking for? I'm looking for different." "Different
how?" I asked. "If
I knew the answer to that, it wouldn't be different." With
that cryptic comment, I figured he must be getting into Zen or some
killer
weed. What he was saying, though, finally became clear to me after I
had been
working with this same issue with beginners at writers workshops.
Every
human is incomprehensibly complex and unique. The difference between
any two
humans is greater than the difference between any two species on this
planet.
Everything you have ever experienced: the hurts, the joys, the defeats,
the
victories, the loves and hates, the lessons, the anti-lessons, the
dreams, the
lusts, and the universe of surrounding events and how you have filtered
and
processed the information, all of this has contributed to making you a
freak in
a world of freaks. While
the other freaks are attempting to hide their differences and be like
"everybody else," your advantage is that you know you are different.
If you become that difference, embrace, explore and utilize it, you
will be
playing to your strength: You are, after all, you. The others,
attempting to
dress up the stories they want to tell to make them look like another
Star Wars
or another Harry Potter or another something else, will be playing to
their
weaknesses, because they are not the storytellers they are attempting
to
imitate.
Working The Story Mines For
a moment, pretend you are an editor mining the low-grade sameness of
the slush
pile, looking for stories to buy. After you've opened and scanned a
couple of
hundred submissions, you can usually pick out the writer the author of
a
particular piece is attempting to emulate. It all gets very
discouraging,
especially when the authors being imitated weren't all that hot to
begin with.
You develop a rhythm after awhile. Open an envelope, scan the first
couple of
pages looking for something to hang a rejection on, stuff it in the
return
envelope along with "We regret your submission doesn't meet our current
requirements," and so on. And
then, once every blue moon, the editor is on page thirty of a
manuscript,
sitting on the edge of his chair, and has no idea how he got there. The
story—well, it's not exactly what they've been buying. In fact, it's
not
exactly like anything the editor has ever seen before. A nugget,
though.
Usually the editor hates this particular kind of experimental sub
genre, and
look at the verb tense for crying out loud. And these characters—what
darkness! In fact there is not a thing about this story that fits
within the
publication's editorial guidelines. That decided, the editor sees he's
on page
fifty and begins making a note to bring this story into conference for
possible
purchase—and he might just resign if it isn't accepted!
Different.
That doesn't mean to be different for the sake of being different. All
it means
is being yourself: writing your own stories your own way. A fellow I
knew back
when he was publishing short fiction, when it came time for him to
write a book
he wanted to write something unlike anything that had ever been written
before
in the genre. He was extremely well read, and he knew what had gone on
before.
When I was sent my copy of the unbound galleys of his novel to read for
a
blurb, I began reading and had to admit after thirty pages that he had
come up
with something unique. I was totally lost. Not
doing anything like others is the same as doing everything like them: they
are still controlling what you are doing and how your are doing it. You
are not
being you. You're attempting to operate a machine designed to be run on
high-octane gasoline on spit and dish water. A
manuscript skillfully written by a human doing his or her own story,
utilizing
that unique filter of that human's own imagination and experience, will
always
stand out. But there is a price above and beyond that of finding that
you are
brown shoes at a tuxedo convention. To be yourself is a risk like no
other. It
can be very frightening.
I
taught writing for a couple of horror-filled semesters at the local
branch of
the University of Maine. There were several bright moments, however,
and one of
them began when one of the students called in to say she couldn't make
it to
class. No explanation. A week later, she came into the tiny office I
shared
with about a hundred other part time faculty, handed me a sheaf of
typewritten
pages, and commanded, "Read that." No
fool I, the reading commenced. In brief, the reason she hadn't been
able to
make it to class was because she had gotten the results on a blood test
her
doctor had ordered a few days earlier. The doctor had called to tell
her that
my student had only weeks to live. The ride is over. The ref is about
to blow
the whistle. She
was crushed. A recovering addict, she had cleaned up her act, turned
her life
around, gone back to college, and up until that doctor called, she had
a future
bright with promise. After all she had struggled through, after all she
had accomplished, this. After
hanging up
the phone, she did a very wise thing that I
recommend to you for your next distress: she grabbed a keyboard and
began
putting her feelings on paper. Brothers
and sisters, I am not exaggerating when I say those pages crackled with
outrage
at the unfairness of it all. Then, all of the might-have-beens, the
sadness
misting me up several times, and I have a high-mist threshold. At last
she
reached a turning point: what to do with the time she had left: Wallow
in
self-pity or become what she could in the time left? Acceptance. I
was emotionally drained as I handed the document back to her. She took
the
manuscript, smiled, and said, "Right after I finished that, the phone
rang. It was the doctor. My blood test had gotten mixed up with another
one of
the doctor's patients. I'm fine." Ohmigod!
All that and a happy ending, too! I
insisted that, when class started, she read this out to the class. She
was
reluctant, and I insisted until her arm cracked and she agreed. She
read it out
and absolutely stunned every one of the students. That young woman had
taken
herself, her vulnerable, raw, twitching self, and put it on the paper
with her
own words, her own way. It was one of the few pieces of writing I've
ever come
across that actually moved me to envy. Of
course, we all insisted that she act to get the thing published, and
she said
there were a few things she wanted to polish up in the story first. We
couldn't
wait. A
week later she read the revised version to the class, and it was one,
long,
solid slab of utility grade spruce. It was less than ordinary. It was
tedious.
Boring. What she had done in her effort to "polish up" the story was
to take every single honest expression of emotion and either eliminate
it or
couch it in terms she considered less revealing. The result was the
death of a
great story.
|
KINDLE TRADE PAPERBACK |
|||
| Purchase
Links |
Top of Page |
|||
|
9.7.2008: 377
|